20101105-1107-fscons2010
差異處
這裏顯示兩個版本的差異處。
| 下次修改 | 前次修改 | ||
|
20101105-1107-fscons2010 [2011/08/13 06:23] lucien 建立 |
— (目前版本) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 行 1: | 行 1: | ||
| - | **Free Society Conference and Nordic Summit 2010** | ||
| - | **Conflicting Values and Norms(Lars Sandman)** | ||
| - | |||
| - | *An ethical model-the goal(邏輯的從個人到群體分析新穎科技帶來的道德爭議問題) | ||
| - | *The goal of ethical conduct is to realize a good life for people | ||
| - | *Experiential well-being | ||
| - | *Desire-fulfilment | ||
| - | *In what way does this information technology add to the good of people's lives? Who will be benefited and who will not? Can we assess a total net benefit of the technology? (From whom's view of point?) | ||
| - | |||
| - | An ethical model-side-constraints | ||
| - | |||
| - | *Respect for autonomy | ||
| - | *If people are autonomous-competent | ||
| - | *Strong norm which we need good reasons to go aginst | ||
| - | *Respect for integrity | ||
| - | *Physical integrity | ||
| - | *Privacy | ||
| - | *According to peoples preferences | ||
| - | *If not possible to assess preferences-caution | ||
| - | *Justice and fair distribution | ||
| - | *Being treated justly-not take into account irrelevant characteristics of the person | ||
| - | *Scarce resources being fairly distributed | ||
| - | *Different ideas around fair distribution | ||
| - | *Equal distribution-type of goods to be distributed? | ||
| - | *Some factors... | ||
| - | |||
| - | In conclusion | ||
| - | |||
| - | *Some critical remarks | ||
| - | *provide a structure and joint fremework for ethical deliberation aroundn the use of information technology in concrete situaions | ||
| - | |||
| - | Question: | ||
| - | |||
| - | *How about FACEBOOK, everyone use that, is that kind of autonomous situation? | ||
| - | *Cautious, face the situation, and fix it. | ||
| - | *FACEBOOK again, privacy situation again. | ||
| - | *If people are well understood the risks, there is no big problem. | ||
| - | |||
| - | **A Labour Process Perspective on the Development of Free Software(Johan Sooderberg)**(資訊科技發展的歷史分析與重要決策/特別在自由軟體相關上) | ||
| - | |||
| - | *Future is going to come. | ||
| - | *為什麼我們國內沒有蒐集爭議，然後分派/分配，逐項解決的機構？ | ||
| - | *Nordic: Life with the style is a MUST. | ||
| - | *Privilege go to the public, but how can the software reliabilities sustained? | ||
| - | *觀古鑑今，什麼是一樣的，什麼是不一樣的，但歷史巨輪的發展方向大致並無二樣。 | ||
| - | *Lowing the price? or use the Public license to improve the bargaining power? | ||
| - | *GPL means no sole person can control dramatically the source code releasing. | ||
| - | |||
| - | **Please copy this record to all of your friends(Christian Villum)**(說明CC的理念以及其可能發展的商業模式) | ||
| - | |||
| - | *改變辦公室的擺設與空間感，生命在哪裡/佈置就在哪裡。 | ||
| - | *The ground principle is "Sharing". | ||
| - | *基本的態度就完全不同，在這裡、新觀念建立新的循環和新的意義，最後帶來利益；但在國內、一切可能直導利益。 | ||
20101105-1107-fscons2010.1313234600.txt.gz · 上一次變更: 2019/01/16 02:43 (外部編輯)
